Keep your data where it belongs
Store, process and control critical workloads in Norway and the EU, while still using the flexibility of global cloud services.
Many organisations moved to hyperscalers for speed and scalability.
Today, regulatory pressure, data sovereignty requirements and security risks are forcing companies to rethink architecture.
Sovereign cloud combined with hybrid cloud gives you the best of both worlds: local control and global scale.
Many organisations moved to hyperscalers for speed and scalability.
Today, regulatory pressure, data sovereignty requirements and security risks are forcing companies to rethink architecture.
Sovereign cloud combined with hybrid cloud gives you the best of both worlds: local control and global scale.
What is Sovereign Cloud?
A sovereign cloud ensures that data, metadata, encryption keys and operational control remain inside trusted legal jurisdictions.
- Access is governed locally.
- Operations are transparent.
- Customers maintain real control over infrastructure and data lifecycle.
Why Hybrid Sovereign Cloud?
Not all workloads are equal. Some must stay local. Others benefit from global scale.
Hybrid sovereign cloud lets you place workloads based on security, performance, cost and compliance requirements.
Sensitive data and regulated workloads → Sovereign private cloud
Burst compute and AI training → Public hyperscaler
Backup and DR → Secondary sovereign region or EU cloud
Customer-facing services → Optimised hybrid placement
Hybrid sovereign cloud lets you place workloads based on security, performance, cost and compliance requirements.
Sensitive data and regulated workloads → Sovereign private cloud
Burst compute and AI training → Public hyperscaler
Backup and DR → Secondary sovereign region or EU cloud
Customer-facing services → Optimised hybrid placement
Topic |
Traditional Public Cloud |
Sovereign Cloud |
Ownership and Control |
Often globally distributed, exact storage location may vary |
Guaranteed storage within Norway / EU / defined jurisdiction |
Legal Jurisdiction |
Subject to provider’s home country laws (often US) |
Subject to local and European legislation |
Data Access Control |
Provider may in certain cases be legally required to grant access |
Customer and local operator control access |
Government Access Risk |
Often provider-managed or shared responsibility |
Customer-owned or locally controlled encryption keys |
Compliance (GDPR, industry regulations) |
Must be built and documented on top of provider platform |
Built into architecture and operations by design |
Operational Transparency |
Limited visibility into physical and operational processes |
Full visibility into operations, processes and controls |
Risk of Foreign Government Access |
Potentially higherValue |
Significantly reduced |
Vendor Lock-in |
Often high |
Typically lower, more open architectures |
Regulatory Adaptability |
Requires additional architecture and control layers |
Designed for regulatory requirements |
Typical Use Cases |
Web applications, global scaling, international services |
Public sector, finance, healthcare, critical infrastructure |
Cost Model |
Low entry cost, can become expensive due to egress and lock-in |
More predictable long-term TCO |
Operational Control |
Provider-operated platform |
Customer and local partner controlled |